MISSOULA - The U.S. Forest Service must include Montanans in the decision making as the agency negotiates with Plum Creek Timber Co. about use of federal land, talks that could enhance company prospects in real estate development, says Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont.
Some county commissioners in Montana have told Tester they fear that Plum Creek-Forest Service talks about access to federal land ultimately will support sale of company timberlands for use in housing developments. Subdividing timberlands can increase the costs counties incur to provide services in far-flung neighborhoods.
The Forest Service insists the private negotiations have served only to "clarify" decades-old road easements, and create no new access rights.
Tester last week wrote Agriculture Undersecretary Mark Rey, who oversees the Forest Service, and requested negotiations cease until representatives of Montana communities are included.
Rey said Wednesday he planned to come to Montana "within the month," saying his goals are to "answer questions, talk through the issues and provide information." He said he'll meet with state land managers as well as interested community officials to explain the results of the agency's talks with Plum Creek.
Missoula County's three commissioners recently wrote to Tester, saying they had learned of talks that occurred between Plum Creek and the Forest Service and were aimed at changing long-standing road easements.
Since the 1960s, the Forest Service and owners of property next to the agency's land have entered agreements that spell out obligations surrounding the shared use and maintenance of forest roads that crisscross property lines. In the minds of some, those agreements allow limited access to haul logs, but not to develop real estate.
In the case of Plum Creek, Rey said, negotiations began in 2006 in an effort to determine whether existing forest road easements "permitted the use of the roads for accessing residential and commercial development." The Forest Service wanted to talk to Plum Creek because as the company moves to sell its lands, the federal agency desires assurance that future landowners will uphold road maintenance requirements long on the books, Rey said.
"The easements were not clear, so we got together and made them clear," Plum Creek spokeswoman Kathy Budinick said.
Joe Brenneman, a commissioner in Flathead County, wonders why it took 18 months of high-level negotiations to make no real changes. He suspects the "clarified" agreement represents some pretty big changes and suggested that Rey's willingness to visit Montana "suggests they may be involved in something pretty substantial here."
Tester's staff has described the negotiations as a "secret, closed-door plan," but Budinick bristled at the notion of closed meetings. Although the public was not included, decisions were reviewed by officials up and down the federal chain of command, she said. "Everyone who needed to be involved was involved," she said.
Rey said the negotiations do not expand Plum Creek's rights, but rather confirm its existing right to access for the subdivision, sale and development of lands. Public involvement was not required because "this is just an update to an existing bilateral agreement," he said.
Missoula County commissioners wrote Tester that "the significance of Plum Creek's ownership in Montana (of) over 1.2 million acres and the development that could happen on those lands in concert with Forest Service assistance reinforces the need for an open public process with local government at the table."
Billingsgazette.com encourages readers to engage in civil conversation with their neighbors. Comments that are submitted go into a queue to be moderated and may take several hours to be reviewed. By submitting a comment, you are agreeing to the terms & conditions set out in our comment policy.
If you have any problems with the new Talk Back! system, please email us.
The forest service does not want public input. They want input on how to run private lands around the forest. This is shown in the Open Space Strategy that showed up this spring. The FS wants to help private land owners manage over 400 million acre's in conjuction with the 192 million of FS lands. That is like telling a wolf to guard the sheep while you are in town. The FS cannot handle what have now. It smells of enviro rats to me. Just google Open Space Strategy and read it.
It's just another Bush big business boondogle brought to you by republican cronyism. When Plum Creek sells off its 1 million plus acres which have been logged relentlessly, the rest of us will no longer have hunting and fishing access-even on foot.
Contact Us | Subscribe
Comment Display Options
